Design for Medicine

Researchers at the Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Applied Materials Research in Bremen, Germany have developed biodegradable surgical screws. The screws are a composite of polylactic acid and hydroxyapatite, biodegradable over 24 months. Hydroxyapatite, a major component of bone, promotes bone growth into the screw.

Full story: Bone-hard biomaterial...

via medgadget.com

I think medical design often ends up showing what designers (or the feature creators) can really do because of the obvious risks involved. Additionally because of the nature of living things, many features must be considered in a simple but complete way. This screw design is not interesting to be because of the materials technology but because of the elegance of the industrial design and the tight relationship of all the features which make it up.

Posted via web from Mark Whiting's posterous

The Zen of Language

I am a lover of Zen, though my notion of Zen is quite specific to a certain perspective, as most peoples' interpretations of that word seem to be. To me, Zen is about a conceptual purity and simplicity but also a high level of appropriateness or correctness for a context. I have thought quite a lot about what this means for design but I am not ready to share that now. 

In any case, recently I have been exposed to another kind of Zen in a vaguely unexpected environment. During my masters here in korea, one of the fundamental things I am learning is the value of a Zen like approach to language. In this case, english, from my professor, who speaks english as a second language. What I mean by this Zen is a kind of ideal use of language to describe exactly what is meant, despite arbitrary complexity and the possibility of various interpretations of words. I think this kind of english is favoured in Korea, because of the way people learn english, as a kind of exact science, and also, favoured at my university, KAIST, because of the kind of publications expected here. Personally, my english is still far from Zen-like, and I think, though I am learning to improve it to participate here, it is probably never going to be as exact as many academics here make it. I believe this because I think native english speakers simply do not tend to treat words with such subtlety of application. Some poets and authors seem to be able to do it, however, most seem to use words like the USA uses oil.

I have never really liked reading, because I am slow at it and distracted easily, however, all my life I have enjoyed learning and acquiring knowledge, especially on mass. I have, on many occasions complained that books are aggravating because they act as a jail for knowledge, hiding it among numerous useless pages of imprecise words. Zen language is thus when every word counts and contributes fully to the meaning, not only of the sentence but to the whole work.

This view of Zen seems to act as a good framing example of what I think the general concept of Zen implies. What do you think? (I am sure my notion of Zen is not in accordance with more formal definitions, let me know if you have a more informed perspective)

Also, does anyone have suggestions about how to become able to write with Zen language? 

The images are a little bit random, just three shots of a lotus farm in Chungdu in SiChuan China. It seems that lotuses are often depicted in relation to Zen. 

See the full gallery on posterous

Posted via email from Mark Whiting's posterous

See Creatures

Sometimes we see creatures because of the way we make things look. This was a quite simple example which turned into a sea creature of sorts when I made it look the wrong way, accidentally. 

I think it is a small creature, perhaps similar to a jelly fish and I think the ridges wave like continuous fins. Perhaps it eats by induction being that it has two loops or by burrowing in the sand and absorbing nutrients. It is hard to know. 

See the full gallery on posterous

Posted via email from Mark Whiting's posterous

Chrome OS as a platform without versions, potentially even for mobile

Chrome OS is really exciting to me, partially because it is like having an OS on a thumb drive, as some people have done, only even more flexible in some ways, and partially because it will break down many of the platform issues that we commonly run into. Software that works in the browser, or at least in Crome, will do so on any computer that can run Chrome or ChromeOS. 

Recently many people are talking about the growing issue of fragmentation of the Android platform and most people seem to be pretty worried about it. Michael Gartenberg has written a related article for engadget, Will Android Fragmentation Destroy the Platform. I think the crux of this issue has a few factors. 

1. People expect to own phones for too long. 2 years is a long time to wait before getting a new phone and right now phones and their contracts are designed to endure this kind of period. This needs to change if technology is going to continue to also change so rapidly
2. Phone manufacturers having to do too much to make Android work they way they want it. I am afraid I do not know much about what they need to do so this point could be framed slightly inaccurately, however, I think if Android was designed to evolve in a more friendly way and if the efforts to make a phone work on a given platform were less significant, then this kind of issue could be reduced quite a lot. 

In any case, as most have probably read, Chrome OS is currently including designs for various different window styles, which are targeted at various different device form factors, including touch input devices. The one platform they have not mentioned targeting is of course mobile handsets, however I tend to think their could be some value in doing so. ChromeOS on a mobile phone would mean several things.

1. Native support for great browsing.
2. Software independence. Because:

1. ChromeOS auto updates - which is not that significant..
2. Chrome is becoming an industry standard and is really good at running almost every website out there and it is really unlikely that there will suddenly be a new kind of browser that can not run on year, or even two year old hardware. 
3. This would also mean that any apps would work on any other phone or platform with a modern browser. 

Device independence. With android you can already log in and out of your phone easily but with ChromeOS syncing you could imagine setting the experience on all your computing devices at once, and not being particularly miffed if data failure of any kind occurred. 

One issue this raises is how manufacturers can give their users a custom experience, however, given the ChromiumOS is open and adaptable I imagine we could see a version which still supported Chrome syncing and updates to the engine etc. 

Also, issues like a dialer could be solved with some local code or with Google Voice, via the mobile HTML5 client. 

I have included a Phone UI mock up based on the current ChromeOS Touch UI which is on the Chromium website. 

In a lot of ways, I am talking about something similar to what Apple seemed to be presenting when they first released the iPhone, a phone without an app store that just uses web apps, however now, it seems this is becoming a desirable reality for several reasons.(sorry I had a link for that but I forgot where it was - perhaps next time) 

So, what would you think about a Chrome OS phone?

See the full gallery on posterous

Posted via email from Mark Whiting's posterous

God of the Black-holes not Just the Gaps

With a 30 minute walk too and from my lab each day I now have a good amount of time to listen to audiobooks (Something I rather like because I am a slow reader usually). In any case, I am currently reading the rather long but interesting, History of Western Philosophy by Bertrand Russell (another good link and his listing on google books). He details the history surrounding many significant philosophical developments, discussing their relevance and their value. So far, apart from hearing a lot about greek philosophers I have also been introduced to 2 points which I find particularly interesting. 

1. Religion of the gaps can be more clearly though of as religion of the black holes in our perception of the world. Many people like to think of the so called 'God of the gaps,' or the idea that religion exists as a way of describing things we don't understand and as history has developed and various findings have occurred in psychology, mathematics, physics and other sciences, more and more aspects of our religions are defined and though of in non religious ways. Bertrand Russell suggests that God, in this way, may be more of a representation of the things we will never understand, not just things we don't understand for now. An example of a contender of this kind could be the meaning of life, which for all intensive purposes, we have no hope of learning without a distinct change to our current secular understanding of the universe. 
2. Learning about others' philosophies through the context of their logic. Bertrand Russell talks about many interpretations of the notion of philosophy as well as several ways of understanding the writings and opinions introduced by others, in particular, philosophers. The significant advice he offeres is to not concentrate on showing that a statement is true of false but instead to understand why the philosopher though it to be true or false at the time that they did. This of course gives us more than simply and understanding of the concept as a group of words but lets us understand the concept as a reaction to a context which we chan then determine to be reasonable or unreasonable and which we can potentially transmute in a useful way to a modern scenario. 

I find both of these to be rather useful ways of thinking, and I would be interested to learn of any extensions of either. 

I rather enjoy consuming audiobooks however I wish there were better services for getting them and I rather wish that more publishers made them of all their content, in particular academic works. 

Posted via email from Mark Whiting's posterous

An interesting user interface innovation. http://www.physorg.com/news186681149.html

Recently I though about UV mapping living humans so we could do interesting skin touch stuff. This system seems to work quite well though it seems a little invasive.

Posted via web from Mark Whiting's posterous